Managing a trust is not as easy as it sounds. You cannot just set money aside, name a trustee, and let them handle the details. What if the trust includes a family business, multiple investment accounts, or real estate? In such a case, a single trustee is forced to juggle too many responsibilities. This can lead to bad investment decisions, family disputes, or mismanagement.
The solution to this problem is to create a directed trust whereby responsibilities are split among different experts. The financial, legal, and family needs of the trust are thus handled separately.
For instance, in a company, the CEO cannot also be the accountant, HR manager, and sales director. A directed trust works the same way because it assigns roles to the right experts.
When one trustee is in charge of everything, emotions can get in the way, especially when it comes to money matters. If a beneficiary feels shortchanged or disagrees with how assets are handled, it can turn into a legal battle.
In a directed trust, these issues are less likely to occur because decision-making is shared. For example:
Mississippi allows directed trusts under Section 91-8-715 of the state’s Uniform Trust Code. Under this provision, different fiduciaries can be held accountable if they don’t follow their responsibilities. Courts have the power to remove advisors or trustees if they mismanage the trust.
Is a Directed Trust Right for Your Estate?
If your trust includes businesses, investments, or valuable property, a directed trust could be a smarter way to manage assets. To learn more about setting up a directed trust in Mississippi, contact O’Brien Law Firm, LLC, today for guidance.
Bankruptcy laws have existed since way before crypto burst onto the scene. However, courts can still apply old rules to new technology. When someone files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the court may claw back certain transactions, especially if they look like an attempt to hide assets.
If a person transferred or withdrew crypto before filing, those funds could be pulled back into the bankruptcy estate. Courts can use blockchain records to find hidden funds and recover money for creditors.
In Chapter 7 cases, courts focus on transactions made before bankruptcy. If a debtor moved assets within 90 days of filing, the court may deem it a preferential transfer under Section 547 of the Bankruptcy Code. If the transfer was done to cheat creditors, it could be labeled a fraudulent transfer under Section 548.
Since crypto transactions are recorded on the blockchain, financial experts can trace where the money went. Courts then decide if those assets should be returned to the bankruptcy estate.
Crypto clawbacks aren’t as simple as recovering cash. Some of the legal questions include:
If you are facing a clawback claim, your defense might include:
If you’re involved in a bankruptcy that includes digital assets, please consider getting legal help. Contact O’Brien Law Firm, LLC, today to discuss your case and protect your financial future.